Our Need for Mastery

Comparing Mastery of our Two Worlds

If we accept, as humanity’s greatest thinkers have done and still do, that we live in two distinct worlds, one physical and the other deeply personal, then the challenge of mastery applies to both.

Success in mastering the physical-impersonal world has led to astounding achievements—think of heart transplants, high-speed trains and aeroplanes, skyscrapers, air-conditioning, computing technologies, and much more.

By comparison, mastering the psychosocial world has had only limited success. We feel helpless, guilty and ashamed about much that occurs today. Aspects of relationships and social life hardly differ from what they were hundreds or even thousands of years ago.

There has certainly been progress.Closed Violence in public seems to have diminished in recent centuries. Evils like slavery or child trafficking were previously assumed as the way of the world, and they still occur, but we now many speak out against such barbarism. Relationships at work can still be abusive and demeaning, but there are laws against it. Governments behave tyrannically today much as they did in the past, but there are outposts of sanity. Family life can be painful and demeaning for women and children in many societies, but efforts to alter this are quite common. Only war and ever more destructive armaments still seem unstoppable.

It is a reasonable conjecture that sustained, disciplined inquiry into how the psychosocial world works, could lead to genuine progress in personal and social life, and even improve international relations.

ClosedMajor difficulties exist …

The demand for reflective awareness, autonomy and responsibility requires us to discard baggage that we use to comfort ourselves, to become aware of temptations, and to recognize masks that people use to manipulate and delude themselves and others. Becoming aware is not new. But doing so in a systematic way, as our inner evolved Taxonomy encourages us to expect, is much harder.

ClosedScience must contribute ...

Mastery must be Personal and Social

Although experiences and thoughts are subjective and felt, activities and achievements are shareable and objective. Covert psychological processes—the psycho- in psychosocial reality—find counterparts in overt social processes and forms—the -social in psychosocial reality.

Inquiry to enable mastery therefore demands:

  • objectification of the subjective
    (e.g. how can I explain this new project of mine to a friend?)

    &

  • subjectification of the objective
    (e.g. the room was left unlocked: who feels responsible?)

Experiential inner states are only known with certainty by the person who has them, so that is where mastery must commence. But private experiences have no significance without some public correlate: so social mastery is also required. Social mastery is dependent on personal mastery.


  • Personal mastery depends on our genetic and environmentally determined make-up. Fortunately the Taxonomy takes our individuality and unique identity into account. Read more.

Originally posted: May 2010; Last amended: 7-Oct-2016