Our Need for Mastery
Comparing Mastery of our Two Worlds
If we accept, as humanity’s greatest thinkers have done and still do, that we live in two distinct worlds, one physical and the other deeply personal, then the challenge of mastery applies to both.
Success in mastering the physical-impersonal world has led to astounding achievements—think of heart transplants, high-speed trains and aeroplanes, skyscrapers, air-conditioning, computing technologies, and much more.
By comparison, mastering the psychosocial world has had only limited success. We feel helpless, guilty and ashamed about much that occurs today. Aspects of relationships and social life hardly differ from what they were hundreds or even thousands of years ago.
It is a reasonable conjecture that sustained, disciplined inquiry into how the psychosocial world works, could lead to genuine progress in personal and social life, and even improve international relations.
Mastery must be Personal and Social
Although experiences and thoughts are subjective and felt, activities and achievements are shareable and objective. Covert psychological processes—the psycho- in psychosocial reality—find counterparts in overt social processes and forms—the -social in psychosocial reality.
Inquiry to enable mastery therefore demands:
-
objectification of the subjective
(e.g. how can I explain this new project of mine to a friend?)&
- subjectification of the objective
(e.g. the room was left unlocked: who feels responsible?)
Experiential inner states are only known with certainty by the person who has them, so that is where mastery must commence. But private experiences have no significance without some public correlate: so social mastery is also required. Social mastery is dependent on personal mastery.
THEE is ultimately a tool for change.
Given that we create our social realities, why is change in social settings so hard? It seems to be due to people: you and me.
All achievement has a rational component, but good technical solutions rarely get implemented as effectively or efficiently as planned. Many taxonomic discoveries emerged from investigating blocked organizations where the cause was typically being traced back to people. Frustration, disappointment and blaming were in evidence.
We identified issues like:
● Distorted perceptions | ● Dulled motivation | |
● Minimal creativity | ● Political deadlock | |
● Passive conformity | ● Poor communication | |
● Resistance to new ideas | ● General confusion | |
● Divergent outlooks | ● Unrealistic attitudes | |
● Personal limitations | ● Unwillingness to learn | |
● Hopelessness+helplessness | ● Negativity and blaming | |
● Power games | ● Maverick tendencies |
Despite this list of woes, the human element in endeavour is not the problem: rather it is the essence and the sine qua non of all achievement. Focusing on systems, information, physical resources, finance, quantitative analyses, training, computer technologies &c, however essential, is never enough for great success. All achievement depends on people. Everyone knows that!
Within people, it depends on specific psychosocial realities that are in operation. Few know that!
For each person, reality emerges distinctively—from an indefinable, intangible human essence with its intuitions and its counter-intuitive judgements, its hopes and hobby horses, its beliefs and anxieties, its pleasure in achievement and its destructive demons, and much more.
- Personal mastery depends on our genetic and environmentally determined make-up. Fortunately the Taxonomy takes our individuality and unique identity into account. Read more.
Originally posted: May 2010; Last amended: 7-Oct-2016